If you have been given the code to join this group please login and then enter the code here.
Service Assurance Working Group
Welcome to the SCSC Service Assurance Working Group (SAWG) area.
The third version of the Service Assurance Guidance Document was released at SSS'22 in February 2022.
The next meeting of the SCSC Service Assurance Working Group (SAWG#46) will be held in-person at BAE Systems, Stirling Square, London on 8th December 2022 from 11:00. Coffee is available from 10:00. Refreshments and lunch are provided. We will be going for a Christmas drink afterwards!
This will be a face-to-face (in-person) meeting. Please come along to meet your colleagues in the WG.
Please contact email@example.com if you would like to attend.
An update presentation on the work of the group was given at SSS'22.
A paper on applying service assurance to a motorways example was presented at SSS'22.
An SCSC Newsletter Article on the Service Assurance Guidance document was published in May 2020.
Two presentations on service assurance were given at SSS'20 in February 2020:
Two presentations on service assurance were given at SSS'19 in February 2019:
This paper on service-based assurance describing progress to date was presented at SSS'18.
Minutes of Meetings
Meeting #19, 11th December 2019, Teleconf (no formal minutes produced, but agreement to issue Guidance Document V1.0 at SSS)
What is Service Assurance?
In this context, this is concerned with service models and provision of services which need an assurance position, i.e. Safety Assured Services. The services delivered can be of many forms (for instance Air Navigation, Fleet Maintenance or e-Prescribing) and can be in diverse domains, e.g. Transport, Defence, Energy or Healthcare. The fundamental difference between systems and services here is that services include people, process, contracts and agreements, and through-life elements (e.g. support and maintenance) as well as all the contributing systems.
It is also noted that many safety-related Information Technology systems are moving (or have moved) to an IT service provision model such as ITIL (Information Technology Infrastructure Library), where established safety standards and guidelines don't readily apply; something new is needed.
ITIL V3 defines a service as: "Services are a means of delivering value to customers by facilitating the outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks."
Why is the SCSC involved?
Many safety-related (and increasingly safety-critical) systems are used in a service context, i.e. consumed as part of an operational scenario (e.g. an ambulance despatch system or air traffic control system). It is recognised that a service view of safety is much more appropriate in these situations as there is a lot more involved than just the individual systems. It is the collaborative working of the systems, people, processes (and also contracts and subcontractors) using a service-oriented architecture (SOA) that gives the overall safety position.
There is very little specific guidance or standards for service assurance in a safety context, hence the SCSC would like to develop some material to assist practitioners in this area.
What will the Working Group do?
The working group will aim to achieve a set of goals for the group, develop a set of activities to achieve the goals and a timeframe in which to produce them. These will likely be guidance materials in the first instance. See below:
Statement of the Problem
It is agreed that the risks presented by safety-related services are rarely explicitly recognised or addressed in current safety management practices, guidelines and standards (which usually take a product-based perspective). It is likely that service (as distinct from system) failures have led to safety incidents and accidents, but this has not always been recognised.
It is acknowledged that a service-oriented approach may help in identifying and managing safety risks more effectively in many service-based scenarios, particularly where there are service contracts or service level agreements (SLAs) in place. This service view of safety will then better inform the content for the agreements put in place to manage the service. There are therefore clear business and societal benefits, in terms of reduced harm, reduced commercial liabilities and improved business efficiencies, in taking a service view of safety.
To produce clear and practical guidance on how services should be managed in a safety related context, to reflect emerging best practice.
Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org if you would like further information.
WG Lead Bio
Mike is an experienced Safety Engineer and Safety Manager with a special interest in systems, services, software and data. He has been actively involved in safety and mission-critical systems for over 30 years, particularly in the aerospace, defence, satellite navigation, rail and health sectors. He is currently working in healthcare projects including hospital patient records and e-prescribing systems. He has led initiatives to produce safety management system definition and competency and training frameworks. He has led a safety practice team of 17 staff; he was also a safety community Leader with over 80 members. He has conducted many safety audits and produced a safety auditor training course.
Mike is currently the SCSC Director and Events Coordinator, leading the technical strategy for the club and organising events including the annual Safety-Critical Systems symposium. He is the chair of both the Data Safety Initiative and Service Assurance working groups producing new guidance for safety assurance in these areas.
He has recently presented several papers on data and services themes at industry conferences.
Mike can be contacted at email@example.com
© SCSC 2022